Whitepaper
  • Whitepaper
    • Humanode
    • Introduction
    • Humanode’s major components
    • Humanode Infrastructure
    • Proof-of-Biometric-Uniqueness (PoBU): The Consensus of the Living
    • Validator Economics and Fee Distribution
    • Humanode as a Living Philosophy: Redefining Power, Identity, and Trust in the Age of Consensus
    • Governance: The Vortex Protocol
    • Biometric Marketplace
    • Fath: A Reflexive, Egalitarian Monetary Protocol
    • Conclusion
    • Appendices
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Core Characteristics of Vortex
  • Decentralized by Default
  • Governance Infrastructure
  • Further Reading

Was this helpful?

  1. Whitepaper

Governance: The Vortex Protocol

Whitepaper v. 0.9.7 “Instrumentality of mankind”

The Humanode network is governed by Vortex, a decentralized governance protocol designed to reflect the same core principles that power the network itself: biometric uniqueness, individual equality, and dynamic contribution. Vortex moves beyond token-weighted voting, establishing a cognitocratic framework where decision-making is decoupled from capital and aligned with Proof-of-Time (PoT), Proof-of-Devotion (PoD), and Proof-of-Governance (PoG).

Core Characteristics of Vortex

  • Equal Voting Power: All human nodes have one vote, regardless of wealth or stake.

  • Tiered Participation: Participants gain access to different proposing rights based on their activity and commitment over time. Higher tiers, such as Citizens, can propose structural changes to the DAO. Tiers do not increase the power of one’s voice.

  • Cognitocratic - meritocratic Evolution: Governance power is determined by non-financial credentials - length of activity, uptime, proposal participation, and constructive contributions to the network.

  • Chamber System: The Vortex DAO is composed of multiple governance chambers, each representing a specialization or focus area. Chambers can create and review proposals, assign formation grants, and coordinate policy development.

  • Proposal Pooling: New ideas and upgrades enter through a proposal pool system, where attention and preliminary support determine progression toward formal voting.

  • Dynamic Metrics: A participant's influence is tracked via Cognitocratic Measure (CM) Scores and proposal reputation, dynamically adjusted based on historical behavior and chamber assessment.

Importantly, Vortex also enables constitutional overrides, like chamber dissolution and vote of censure, ensuring that governance structures remain transparent, flexible, and responsive to abuse or inaction.

Decentralized by Default

In Vortex, delegation is liquid, and all proposals are public and on-chain. Early governance experimentation has shown that distributing proposition and assessment rights based on PoT and PoD leads to more organic, transparent, and non-plutocratic governance outcomes. While governance roles cannot be purchased or rented, they can be earned - and lost - through continuous participation or lack thereof.

Governance Infrastructure

Key components supporting the Vortex protocol include:

  • Formation: A decentralized grant system that assembles teams and funds proposals approved by chambers.

  • CM Score: A metric system used to evaluate proposal quality and participant credibility.

  • Attention Quorum: An anti-corruption mechanism preventing low-quality or malicious proposals from progressing.

Further Reading

PreviousHumanode as a Living Philosophy: Redefining Power, Identity, and Trust in the Age of ConsensusNextBiometric Marketplace

Last updated 8 days ago

Was this helpful?

For a complete and detailed explanation of the governance structure, mechanics, and emergent dynamics of Vortex, please refer to the full Vortex whitepaper:

Vortex 1.0